Tyler Stice vs Credit Chaiyarin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 04:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Stice vs C. Chaiyarin

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

THA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stice 1 - 0 Chaiyarin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tyler Stice winning 2 and Credit Chaiyarin winning 0. The last match between Tyler Stice and Credit Chaiyarin was at the M15 Hua Hin, 28-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tyler Stice getting the victory 6-2 3-2 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stice | 1 |
| Chaiyarin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Hua Hin(10-28-25)
T. Stice vs C. Chaiyarin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.60% (60-46) | Career Total W/L | 34.71% (84-158) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Stice vs C. Chaiyarin Match Preview:
- In recent months, Credit Chaiyarin has a slight edge in second serve performance, securing 42.40% of these points compared to Tyler Stice, who achieved 42.06%. Does this minor advantage indicate a potential strength for Chaiyarin? Potentially, yes.
- When examining return games, Chaiyarin outperforms Stice by winning 46.45% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Stice manages 43.08%.
- Conversely, Stice has a superior first serve return success rate at 25.28%, surpassing Chaiyarin's 23.51%. Could this give Stice a counteractive advantage? It seems possible.
- Under pressure, Stice excels in breakpoint saves, achieving 53.42%, a slight advantage over Chaiyarin's 51.32%.
- From a broader win-loss perspective over the last year, Stice's performance is notably better with a 40.54% win rate, compared to Chaiyarin's 16.00%.
- On indoor hard surfaces, both players show equal competence, each having a career win rate of 40% on this surface, although both struggle on clay.
- Player level analysis shows that Stice predominantly competes at similar event levels to Chaiyarin, but with significantly better success at 40.54% match wins against Chaiyarin's 11.76%.
- Stice has faced stronger competition on average, playing opponents ranked 450.92 compared to Chaiyarin’s 493.16.
- When matches extend to deciding sets, Stice again holds a slight advantage, winning 55% compared to Chaiyarin's 50%, indicating resilience under pressure.
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
As we examine the recent statistics, Tyler Stice shows a comprehensive advantage over Credit Chaiyarin. Despite Chaiyarin's marginally better second serve performance, Stice compensates with superior breakpoint saving abilities and return of first serves.
The win-loss record over the last year and performance in decider sets also strongly lean in favor of Stice. Adding to this, Stice has contended with stronger opponents, suggesting greater match readiness at higher competitive levels.
Considering all factors, Tyler Stice is the more likely winner in this upcoming encounter, primarily due to his overall superior stats and competitive experience.
Tyler Stice vs Credit Chaiyarin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Stice vs C. Chaiyarin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:24:39 | Average Match Time | 1:24:39 |
| 58% (18/31) | 1st Serve % | 58% (33/57) |
| 61% (11/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 62% (8/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (8/24) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 54% (31/57) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12/31) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Stice Recent Matches Played
C. Chaiyarin Recent Matches Played

T. Stice vs C. Chaiyarin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.60% (60/46) | YTD Win/Loss | 34.71% (84/158) |
| 53.91% (131/112) | Sets Win/Loss | 37.12% (193/327) |
| 51.16% (1190/1136) | Games Win/Loss | 46.08% (2188/2560) |
| 59.21% (45/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 39.74% (60/91) |
| 48.00% (12/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 24.69% (20/61) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 64 | Aces Total | 269 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 208 | Total Double Faults | 371 |
| 1:25:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 342.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 300.31 |
| 64% (3268/5140) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4385/7321) |
| 63% (2073/3268) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2816/4385) |
| 48% (895/1871) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1377/2936) |
| 43% (241/555) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (245/590) |
| 41% (2136/5197) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2693/7164) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 12.50% (2/14) |
| 57.14% (60/45) | Futures W/L | 36.28% (82/144) |
| 57% (60/105) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (83/234) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (14/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 34% (10/29) |
| 67% (20/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (18/43) |
| 88% (49/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (87/74) |
| 12% (49/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (87/13) |
| 30% (57/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (154/10) |